European Court of Human Rights · Strasbourg

A rigorous path to the European Court of Human Rights.

English-language guidance on admissibility, the four-month time limit, Rule 47 and preparing a complete application supported by the domestic case file.

Updated 28 August 2026English guidanceCabinet in Strasbourg
01

The Court’s role

First determine whether Strasbourg is the right forum.

The European Court of Human Rights is not an additional level of appeal. Its task is to determine whether a State Party is responsible for a violation of a right protected by the European Convention on Human Rights or its Protocols.

A useful preliminary analysis connects the facts, the domestic decisions and the Convention right relied upon. It also identifies which complaints were raised before the national courts and whether an effective domestic remedy remained available.

02

Article 34 and Article 35

Admissibility must be addressed before the merits.

The admissibility criteria are cumulative and fact-sensitive. The following points are only an orientation, not a determination of admissibility.

  • The applicant must normally claim to be a victim of the alleged violation.
  • The complaint must concern responsibility attributable to a State Party.
  • Effective domestic remedies must ordinarily have been exhausted.
  • The application must, in principle, be lodged within four months of the final domestic decision.
  • The complaint must fall within the Court’s jurisdiction and disclose an arguable Convention issue.
  • Other procedural bars, including duplication and abuse of the right of application, must be considered.
03

Rule 47

Build a self-contained and complete application.

The Court’s official instructions require use of the current application form. The facts, alleged violations and compliance with the admissibility criteria must be stated concisely and legibly, with the required signatures and supporting documents.

  1. 01Reconstruct the full domestic chronology.
  2. 02Identify the final decision and notification evidence.
  3. 03Link each complaint to a Convention right.
  4. 04Organise decisions and evidence in a clear annex list.

According to the Court’s current guidance, the form should be downloaded, completed, printed, signed and sent by post with the necessary documents. Applicants should verify the official instructions immediately before filing.

04

Primary sources

Use the Court’s current documents.

Cover of Bringing a Case Before the European Court of Human Rights by Dilbadi Gasimov

English practical guide

Bringing a Case Before the European Court of Human Rights

A Practical Guide to Admissibility — by Dilbadi Gasimov

A 250-page English-language guide designed to help readers understand the admissibility framework before an application is prepared. It provides a structured route through victim status, domestic remedies, the four-month rule, jurisdiction and the formal requirements of an application.

English250 pagesPublished 12 December 2025ISBN 979-8278458913
View the book on Amazon

Frequently asked questions

Before starting an application.

Is the European Court of Human Rights an appeal court?

No. It does not rehear the case as a further domestic court or automatically quash a national judgment. It examines whether a State Party is responsible for a breach of a right protected by the Convention or its Protocols.

What is the time limit for lodging an application?

Article 35 provides, in principle, a four-month period from the final domestic decision. Identifying the relevant decision and the exact starting point requires a case-specific assessment.

Can an application be filed online?

The Court’s official instructions state that the current application form must be downloaded, completed, printed, signed and sent by post with the necessary documents. Applicants should always check the Court’s current instructions before sending a file.

Does contacting the firm stop a time limit?

No. A request for information, a consultation booking or correspondence with the firm does not suspend or interrupt any limitation period.

Confidential assessment

Present your situation to the firm.

Prepare the final domestic decision, evidence of its notification, a short chronology and the main documents. The firm can assess the procedural route and the information required for a first consultation.

Request a consultation